State Data Center of Iowa

First and foremost, I enjoyed reading “The Invisible Hour.” It was the right book at the right time for me. I needed something fast-paced and light and compelling and fun. But it was also silly and sort of ludicrous. I liked it and I hated it. That is how some books are. I haven’t read Alice Hoffman before, but I will pick up any book about modern-day Puritanical societies hidden in the wilds of Western Massachusetts. And the novel is about the love of reading, which resonates with me. “The Invisible Hour” is about Mia, a young girl, living in a restrictive collective community who discovers books and through those books finds herself and learns about the outside world. The book that changes her life is “The Scarlett Letter.” She escapes the collective, finds kindred spirits (and they are librarians!) that help her get on her feet, and rereads Hawthorne. I like Nathaniel Hawthorne. Puritan guilt is something I relate to and he explores that quite frequently in his fiction. He is moody and dark and great with imagery. “The House of the Seven Gables” is one of my favorites. All of this works for me. But then Mia falls in love and that is where the book goes off the rails. This book turns suddenly to have elements of “Back to the Future” mixed with “Outlander,” but with Nathaniel Hawthorne, which was weird to read. I guess you could say that Hoffman is exploring the relationship between author and reader, its intimacies, and power. Overall, it was fun. -Anne M